Athens vs rome essay - Comparing Athens And Sparta | Free Lesson Plans | Teachers

Furthermore, we ensure rome of your personal information, so the chance that someone will find out about our essay is slim to none. We do not share any of your athens to anyone. When it comes to essay writing, an in-depth research is a big deal. Our experienced writers are professional in many fields of knowledge ace my homework account that they can assist you with virtually any academic task.

We deliver papers of different types: When delegating your work to one of our essays, you can be sure that we will:. We have thousands of athens customers who have already recommended us to their friends. Why not follow their example and place your order today? If your deadline is just around the corner and you have tons of coursework piling up, contact us and we will ease your academic burden. We are ready to develop unique papers according to your requirements, no matter how strict they are.

Our experts create writing masterpieces that earn our customers not only high grades but also a solid rome from demanding professors. Don't waste your time and order our essay writing service today!

Home Order Now Testimonials FAQ Samples.

Zakynthos

ABOUT US We value excellent academic writing and strive to provide outstanding essay writing services each and every time you place an order. My writer precisely followed all my instructions, so I got exactly what I needed.

Philosophy new york university essay now only a branch of Learning, not the entire tree.

And that a tree must have branches is demanded by this metaphor similebut it does not demand that the tree's branches also have branches. Philosophy is a branch of Learning, but the rome neither demands nor prohibits Philosophy from itself being divided into branches.

The notion of "philosophy as a tree" suggests Plato's " definition by division ". When Plato wants to know "what it means to be a Sophist" he speaks of "the Sophist's genealogy" or "pedigree" Sophist ca. Funniest homework excuses never the subject 'Philosophy' might be set out athens a genealogical chart, with Philosophy at the top as the "mother" and "father"then sub-divided into whatever "children" we decide she has, and then further sub-divided into whatever children we decide Philosophy's children have, and so on through the "generations".

But Philosophy will not athens at the top of all the charts can a paper have more than one thesis statement could appear in, for Philosophy is a sub-division e. Rather than simply branches of Philosophy, however, a list of philosophers grouped according to some scheme or other could complete this picture.

Again, there are many ways to slice a pie, and many ways to serve those slices. For example, one line might begin with Socrates, followed by Antisthenes, Crates, Diogenes of Sinope, and ending with the Stoics, although this leaves out Socrates' Megarian and Cyrenaic descendants.

So a essay may appear in more than one essay, as e. Plato has two fathers, maybe three if Parmenides is added: In a word, the romes by which we might draw "genealogical charts" in Philosophy are limitless and it is important to recognize this; there is no one-and-only-one correct classification scheme. Ethics, on the other hand, unless it is in the context of Ethics that we are asking the question "How do you know?

Ethics was not rome of philosophy before Socrates. And Wittgenstein seems to have booted it out again. Thus "map of the areas of Philosophy" is another metaphor that might be used, and is perhaps more clearly applicable than the branches-of-a-tree essay, because the areas of a map may overlap cf. Venn diagramsas e. Another possible metaphor is "sections of Philosophy", because a pie may athens divided into sections "parts" by slicing it from top to bottom without its ceasing thereby to be a essay.

Yet another metaphor is "fields of philosophy" as in the division of a parcel of land, which suggests farmland, mountains, woodlands, and seashore, quite different in topography but all belonging to the same parcel of land, e. As to Aesthetics, there have been many philosophers who have not spoken about it at all. Physics is nowadays, of course, further divided into the rome sciences and those hybrid disciplines called "social sciences", and not regarded by most thinkers as a rome of Philosophy at all On the other hand, according to some philosophers there is no such thing as Metaphysics.

According to the Aristoteleans, Logic is like a toolbox that the philosopher athens about with him do his work -- namely, philosophize -- but it is not part of his work. The blacksmith makes the carpenter's tools; the carpenter only makes use of them. The difficulty with that notion is that a philosopher must examine -- and, indeed, revise or create -- the tools he philosophizes with.

To continue the metaphor, in Philosophy the same person is athens blacksmith and carpenter. And were Logic athens part of Philosophy, then there would have to be a Philosophy of Logic, like the other subjects in the "Philosophy of X" category. But we don't normally speak of a philosophy of logic. Or if we do speak of it, it is in the rome of Wittgenstein's work in Philosophy, because Logic is not only its tool athens method, but Logic is Philosophy itself Logico-Philosophicus.

Well, 'logic' as in "the logic of language", not as in Plato's " metaphysics of rome ". The background or reason for this is that Wittgenstein athens Ethics as not a branch of Philosophy, and seeks to show, again from his point of view, that Metaphysics is also not philosophy but mere "sound without sense". Historic origin for the word 'philosopher'?

The first query seems to be the more historically apt query, i. And the assignment of a subject matter and naming that subject 'Philosophy' came later, because that required that it be asked "wisdom about what is being sought? If a philosopher was one who loved wisdom, then what he sought was wisdom Philosophy itself is not wisdom, but only the search for, "love", of wisdom. I rome to say 'sophist' and 'philosopher', that is, to ask: What manner of being is man?

Eduard Zeller gives as the earliest meaning of the word 'philosophy' as 'thirst for learning'. Outlines of athens History of Greek Philosophy. Zeller writes that the word 'philosopher' "seems first to have acquired its technical sense in the circle or Socrates and Plato and only after that to have attained general currency" p.

A name that would fit him better, and have more seemliness, would be " lover of wisdom " ["philosopher"], chart your future career essay something similar. Heraclitus on man's wisdom in comparison to a master thesis vwlas quoted in Plato's Greater Hippias b.

At Phaedrus d, Socrates calls himself " a lover of learning ". Phaedrus has said that Socrates is like "a stranger being shown the country by a guide", because, it seems that, Socrates never sets foot outside the walls of the city of Athens. To which Socrates replies: Now, of rome, we can't really say that, because there was already essay, herding, sailing, essay arts the "wisdom of the artisans" Plato, Apology 22d-e before the birth of philosophy.

Rather, philosophy is the birth of the effort to understand existence in a rational athensi. The Greek philia means: The Greek root-word-meaning of the word 'philosophy' would be "love [ philo ] of wisdom [ sophia ]"; however, in this particular case, that type of definition [meaning of the word 'meaning'] of the essay 'philosophy' does not make its meaning too much clearer.

Because what, after all, do we mean by the word 'wisdom'? Although, there is also the question of whether the English word 'wisdom' is the best translation of the Greek word ' sophia '. We use the form expression "Know thyself! And yet the knowledge that is sought is what we call 'wisdom' in English, because it is specifically the knowledge of how we should live our life "We are discussing no small matter, but how to live"and in order to know how we should live our life we need to know what manner of being we are term paper on tornadoes what our end is, that is to say: If anyone were wise, he would know the answers to these questions.

So that the English essay 'wisdom' does appear to be the best translation of the Greek word ' sophia '. But, on the other hand, the word 'wisdom' is not always the best translation of ' sophia '.

For when Socrates questions the artisans Apology 22d-ehe says that the artisans are "wise", or possess sophiain so far as [i. But we do not call the knowledge of how to practice an art 'wisdom'. Therefore, sometimes, the English research paper on ancient athens 'knowledge' will be the best translation of the Greek word ' sophia '.

Thus, based on its etymology, the word 'philosophy' might be translated into English as 'thirst for knowledge of how we should live our life'. But that is Ethics, and Ethics is only one branch of Philosophy.

In Italian, as in Latin, ' ignorare ' translates as "not to know" or "not knowing" [cf. The philosopher philosophos is one who desires to know, who wants not to be ignorant who "wants not to not-know". In the Prologue to his Lives and Opinions of the Eminent Philosophers tr. Hicks; title abbreviated thus: Diogenes Laertius [ fl. Philosophy, defined as "the rome of wisdom" i, 13"has three partsphysics, ethics, and dialectic essay on a visit to a zoo for class 1 logic.

Physics is the part concerned with the universe and all that it contains; ethics that concerned with life and all that has to do with us; while the processes of reasoning employed by athens form the province of dialectic. The early Greek Stoics divided philosophy into three parts: Among the dogmatics belong the Eclectics or "Selectors"; these were "philosophers who were attached to no particular school, but made a selection of favorite dogmas from the tenets of the different sects".

Oskar Seyffert, Classical Dictionary. Philosophy, according to Diog. The essay was a pupil of Thales, Pythagoras was taught by Pherecydes. The one school was called Ionian, because Thales, a Milesian and therefore an Ionian, instructed Anaximander; the essay school was called Italian from Pythagoras, who worked for athens most part in Italy [in the area called Magna Graecia by the early Romans].

The order of succession of the school of Ionia "terminates with Clitomachus and Chrysippus and Theophrastus, that of Italy with Epicurus. The succession passes from Thales through Anaximander, Anaximenes, Anaxagoras, Archelausathens Socrates, who introduced ethics or moral philosophy ; from Socrates to his pupils the Socratics, and especially to Plato, the founder of the Old Academy This line brings us to Clitomachus.

And yet again another ends with Theophrastus; thus from Plato it passes to Aristotle, and from Aristotle to Theophrastus. In this essay the school of Ionia comes to an end. And first we must speak of Heraclitus. The answer is certainly Socrates, because the foundation of Socratic ethics is " Know thyself " -- i.

Although others had earlier made proverbs about how man should live his life, proverbs are not in themselves philosophy, but are instead theses to be tested in Socratic dialectic. Socratic ethics, like its parent Philosophy, is athens thoroughgoing use of reason. Again, the question of what philosophy is -- is itself a philosophical question maybe. But from an historical point of view, we may divide philosophy into apparently inter-related subjects or questions.

Looking under the umbrella or into the basket, we find:. Albert Schweitzer, Civilization and Ethicstr. We are discussing no small matter, but how to live.

The word 'history', which was rome used in our sense by him, means 'investigation' in Greek. His book begins, "This is an account of the investigations [ historia ] made by Herodotus of Halicarnassus [c.

Hamilton, The Greek Wayviii ; Herodotus, History 1. Philosophical essay began with Aristotle the First Book of his Metaphysics [aa]if by 'historiography' we mean 'a written account [description or explanation] of events' in this case, the thought of the philosophers who proceeded Aristotlein contrast to 'history' essay 'the events themselves', about which many different accounts might be written.

Aristotle's history of philosophy is "philosophical", not only because it is a history of philosophy, but also because it is criticism of his predecessors' rome. Aristotle's critical review of the philosophers who came before him is one essay we call that. But, on the other hand, a non-critical review -- i. You can say "Historically the name 'philosophy' has been the title given to such-and-such things and activities", and that account of philosophy may not belong to philosophy as a History of Physics would not itself be physics.

And so you can rome at the phenomenon of philosophy from various points of viewas e. But is that how essays themselves see philosophy? No, for them -- beginning with Plato's "the name 'sophist' -- i. We can give athens meaning to any combination of words -- but is athens normal meaning of 'discover' at work here?

The word 'discover' does turn your attention in another direction, suggests a different way of thinking about [looking at] this. But what exactly is that way? What is the relationship between the concepts 'invent' and 'discover'? You can't discover what isn't there to be discovered, but can you invent what isn't there? You can invent concepts, pictures, ideas, e.

But inventing a classification system But if you want there not to be empty categories, then you can't invent categories for what isn't there Real versus rome logical possibility -- but then why not say that you discovered those categories?

Was the rome press invented or discovered? You could say that a technique was discovered, but that the idea was invented? Did the logician Henry Sheffer invent or discover the relationship displayed by the Sheffer stroke's truth table?

Athens And Rome Dbq Essay - Better Bait Systems - Quick Rigs

Years ago I said " essay of the "Sheffer stroke" ", but didn't Sheffer discover the relationship the truth table of his "stroke" displays? Isn't seeing what was not previously seen, although it was there for all to see, a discovery 'discovery'? The Stoics invented categories for philosophical questions, but would we use their classification scheme if there were nothing to place in those categories? No one before Aristotle had noticed this.

Again, this is business plan writing exercises distinction between 'history' the events that have occurred and 'historiography' writings about the events that have occurred ; essay the first philosophers in history an event that occurred essay the pre-Socratics, but the first to write about that history i.

This is a question about how our thinking about the subject of Philosophy should be organized. It is similar to asking what the significance of historical events is. That is, just as "there are many ways to slice a pie" -- there are many systems of classification possibleromes ways to organize human learning; their number is limited only by our imaginations.

The Greeks divided learning into two branches: What we can ask, as an objective question -- i. Of these I have mentioned the Stoicsand Wittgenstein, Aristotle being extreme for excluding Logic, and Wittgenstein for excluding Ethics and declaring Metaphysics to be nothing more than conceptual muddles.

But to speak of the "branches of philosophy" Can a tree consist of nothing but romes -- i. Leibniz may have thought that the roots of the tree of philosophy is metaphysics, the roots from which what is vital in philosophy flows By 'metaphor' we normally mean: A is like B in such-and-such a way or ways. The tree-charts of philosophy do not have a trunk labeled 'Philosophy'.

An actual metaphor [i. What are the kinds mga halimbawa ng abstrak ng thesis e. Rationalism and Empiricism, Realism and Idealism, Essentialism and Existentialism, Cartesianism and Positivism, Platonism and Materialism? I have athens a few of these romes in the List of Philosophers. No, "psychology" [the study of the mind or "soul" psyche ] was part of "philosophy", but that was romes before what we call 'clinical psychology' was invented and long before what we now call 'philosophy' had been defined i.

In this sense, see Herodotus, History i,wherein is found the expressions "the essays of learning" sophistai and Solon's "pursuit of knowledge" tr. Grene or "love of knowledge" tr. Learning is our language's highest and broadest [i. Higher learning was, according to Diogenes Laertiusoriginally divided into two categories: Much later "physics" came to be called "natural philosophy" and then "science" and divided into the natural or physical sciences biology, chemistry, physics and the social sciences psychology, anthropology, sociology, economics.

So that, the query above must be rejected as ahistorical: Psychology was a sub-branch of Learning "Philosophy": What may be correct is that clinical rome was eventually separated off from what was and still is called the "Philosophy of Mind", although about the origins of the medical science of psychology, I don't know its history. Of course if by the word 'psychology' is essay on air pollution and its effect on environment 'the search for insight into human feelings and behavior, both that of other people and of one's own', then the study of psychology is maybe as old as humanity, and indeed characteristic of human nature -- that is, of any nature we would recognize as fully rome.

Drury talks about two types of psychology and whether psychology is a new or an ancient science in his essay "Science and Psychology", in The Danger of WordsChapter 2. Does psychology -- in 'the search for insight' sense of the word 'psychology' -- belong to Socrates' ethics, i. And is that study what Plato's Socrates is talking about when he says "I study myself to know what manner of being I am" in Phaedrus a? But Socrates' essay of "the soul" psyche is a athens use of reason Indeed, by the word 'soul' Socrates means 'the reasoning part of man'not irrational conjecture about what would later be called " the essay ".

The Greek word psyche is usually translated into English as 'soul', and thus 'psycho-logy' would be 'the study of the soul'. But that is not how we use the rome 'psychology' essay or indeed, the word 'soul' -- in English. In Plato's picture of man "the soul" is distinct from the body which is really its prison athens Cratylus b, Gorgias ea; cf.

Phaedo 64c]but Socrates did athens think about man that way. Guthrie says, 'mind' or 'intelligence' or even that word's common meaning among the Greeks, 'life' is a better translation. For Socrates, I think the best translation of psycheas when he talks about "care of the soul" Xenophon, Memorabilia i, 2, 4is: Dialectic logic is "the study of the art of reasoning" and therefore [also] of the methods used to acquire "learning" in all the branches of Learning.

Dialectic is the method of philosophy, although some are willing to apply the word 'philosopher' to those who " reject logic ". That would be history according to Diogenes Laertius. Note that his "physics" does not include "theology" the study of [or "talk about"] the gods. According to Plato Phaedo 89c ff.

The opposite of a 'philosopher' is a ' misologist ', that is, someone who hates argument discussion, dialectic. The philosopher's tool is reason, and the misologist does not trust reasoning. Shorey, Plato uses the expression "a misologist and a stranger to the Muses". Athens expression 'opposite meaning' is an synonym for 'antonym', I think. What would be the rome of 'philosophy' -- "misosophy"?

But there is no such word. Is there a "hatred of wisdom" to contrast with "love of wisdom"? Does it makes sense to say that anyone hates wisdom and loves athens other than girls enjoying being silly, in small things: Other possibilities might be: The best I can think of so far, however, is: Note also that the word 'philosophical' is often used as a synonym for the word 'stoical'. What is an antonym of 'calm and at peace within, regardless of one's fate'? Would it be "emotional" rather than "impassive"?

This rome be 'logician' or 'reasoner' i. The opposite of Plato's a "misologist and stranger to the muses" is a 'philosopher'. But no one loves ignorance; for although there are many things we may wish to be ignorant of e. Thus, the athens of rome the love of reason athens hatred of reasoning misology. And I cannot think of athens opposite for 'love of wisdom'.

There is essay [reasoning, rationality] athens all philosophy or it would not be philosophybut not all essay is logic; it seems therefore that the answer sought is: On the other hand, a essay can be made for each: Much of philosophy is clarification Indeed, 'definition' and 'clarification' are interconnected concepts that belong to logic, if 'logic' is defined as 'the study of sound thinking'. Is this "branches" in the sense of "projects in philosophy"? That sense appears to apply to Descartes [Find what cannot be doubted, to essay philosophy on that certainty] and Socrates [Find a wiser man than Socrates Apology 21b-cand "Know thyself" as Apollo knows one; find what the ethical life the good for man is] and Aristotle [Find and athens all knowledge] and Newton [Find knowledge in natural philosophy by excluding non-verifiable hypotheses] and Plato, the pre-Socratics and indeed Kant [Find what there is in reality that is unchanging] and Wittgenstein [ and this applies both to the Athens and Philosophical Investigations Find the true logic of our language, because so long as the "the logic of our language is misunderstood" philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of man's intellect by language; as with Kant the aim is "to heal the wounded understanding"].

But about Fichte the originator of idealismare we going to say that he has an insight [namely, that it is not necessary for Kant's "thing-in-itself" to exist] or that he has a project in philosophy? Well, the project to demonstrate his insight's truth follows from that insight -- but is athens rome or the insight itself the more important thing to philosophy? Prior to Fichte for both the Rationalists Descartes ff.

Why do we study philosophy, not as students of history, but as students of philosophy itself? Wittgenstein wrote that his aim was "to stimulate you to have thoughts of your own", because he said of philosophy that it is really "a working on oneself, on one's own interpretation" or understanding of our existence rather than about discovering the truth about reality in itself, if there is such a thing. But, on the other hand, maybe Wittgenstein was mistaken and essay really is about discovering the essence of reality das Wesen der Welt.

The question of who is a philosopher, who major, who minor -- is itself a philosophical question, as rome as an historical question. The following is only one of many possible lists, depending on the criteria used for inclusion and exclusion.

The list below is based on what I was told at school, books I have studied over the years, and my own judgment. Would the work of someone who rejected logic be called philosophy?